From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31174 invoked by alias); 5 Dec 2003 04:57:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 31166 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2003 04:57:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 Dec 2003 04:57:42 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.24 #1 (Debian)) id 1AS82A-0003w2-S6; Thu, 04 Dec 2003 23:57:42 -0500 Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2003 04:57:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: "J. Johnston" Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [WIP] pending breakpoint support Message-ID: <20031205045742.GC13705@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: "J. Johnston" , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <3FBAC14D.4060002@redhat.com> <20031119150659.GA14955@nevyn.them.org> <3FBBFD90.8080106@redhat.com> <3FBE95D3.4000300@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3FBE95D3.4000300@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg00195.txt.bz2 On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 05:46:43PM -0500, J. Johnston wrote: > I tried leaving the breakpoint around to allow for "break in all shared > libs" but that experiment fell flat because it ended up creating the same > breakpoint multiple times as each shared library gets loaded (e.g. it keeps > finding printf over and over again in libc). This patch still finds the > first occurrence in a shared library and then deletes the pending > breakpoint. Are there plans to identify the shared library for a > breakpoint in the proposed changes? No concrete plans, but this definitely can and should be addressed later. I have a couple of ideas but I want to get something implemented (eventually) before speculating. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer