From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3653 invoked by alias); 4 Dec 2003 21:45:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 3646 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2003 21:45:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO faui10.informatik.uni-erlangen.de) (131.188.31.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Dec 2003 21:45:10 -0000 Received: from faui1d.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui1d [131.188.31.34]) by faui10.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (8.9.3p3/8.1.9-FAU) with ESMTP id WAA23628; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 22:45:09 +0100 (CET) From: Ulrich Weigand Received: (from weigand@localhost) by faui1d.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (8.9.3p3/8.1.6-FAU) id WAA07842; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 22:45:09 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <200312042145.WAA07842@faui1d.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> Subject: Re: [PATCH] S/390 port modernization 1/4 To: jimb@redhat.com (Jim Blandy) Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 21:45:00 -0000 Cc: weigand@i1.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Ulrich Weigand), gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, uweigand@de.ibm.com In-Reply-To: from "Jim Blandy" at Dec 04, 2003 04:16:32 PM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg00144.txt.bz2 Jim Blandy wrote: > Would it be possible to have s390-nat.c simply use the structures from > s390-tdep.c? There's nothing wrong with having an s390-tdep.h file in > the gdb directory; that's the usual arrangement for native systems. As these offsets are core kernel ABI that will never change, I hadn't thought it necessary to avoid this duplication -- in particular as one of my goals was to disentangle the various components as much as possible ... But if you prefer a s390-tdep.h file, I can certainly do that. Bye, Ulrich -- Dr. Ulrich Weigand weigand@informatik.uni-erlangen.de