From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 488 invoked by alias); 4 Dec 2003 18:02:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 481 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2003 18:02:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mclean.mail.mindspring.net) (207.69.200.57) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Dec 2003 18:02:56 -0000 Received: from user-119a90a.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.36.10] helo=berman.michael-chastain.com) by mclean.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1ARxoW-0007et-00; Thu, 04 Dec 2003 13:02:56 -0500 Received: by berman.michael-chastain.com (Postfix, from userid 502) id 68CA84B35C; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 13:03:06 -0500 (EST) To: ac131313@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, jjohnstn@redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] more structs.exp kfails Message-Id: <20031204180306.68CA84B35C@berman.michael-chastain.com> Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 18:02:00 -0000 From: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg00121.txt.bz2 ac> The attatched tweaks structs.exp so that it KFAILs the case where a ac> "return struct" fails because the target hasn't implemented the relevant ac> code. I like it! Michael C