From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21639 invoked by alias); 2 Dec 2003 06:06:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21626 invoked from network); 2 Dec 2003 06:06:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO takamaka.act-europe.fr) (142.179.108.108) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 2 Dec 2003 06:06:22 -0000 Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id C15D447D5B; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 22:06:20 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 06:06:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] OSF/1 - "next" over prologueless function call Message-ID: <20031202060620.GO22119@gnat.com> References: <20031202042646.GW1186@gnat.com> <20031202043042.GA12528@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031202043042.GA12528@nevyn.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg00041.txt.bz2 > About the general principle, I'm unsure - I'd like to think a little > more or have someone else's opinion. But about the OSF/1 specific > target hook: no, this should be an Alpha-specific target hook instead. > The GNU tools perform this same optimization (and may do something > similar on MIPS soon). Thanks. I wasn't sure whether this was an OSF/1-only optimization, or an optimization that might be used by other tools, so I stayed conservative and chose to define it in alpha-osf1-tdep.c. The hook can be moved to alpha-tdep.c instead, if the general principle is kept. -- Joel