Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@gnat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] OSF/1 - "next" over prologueless function call
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 04:30:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031202043042.GA12528@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031202042646.GW1186@gnat.com>

On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 08:26:46PM -0800, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> 
> So I suggest we refine this test to use a new gdbarch function which,
> by default, would be the exact equivalent of this equality check. But
> I then provide an OSF/1-specific version of this function that checks
> that we stopped either at the first instruction of the function, or
> right after the couple of instructions forming the ldgp macro.

About the general principle, I'm unsure - I'd like to think a little
more or have someone else's opinion.  But about the OSF/1 specific
target hook: no, this should be an Alpha-specific target hook instead.
The GNU tools perform this same optimization (and may do something
similar on MIPS soon).

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer


  reply	other threads:[~2003-12-02  4:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-12-02  4:26 Joel Brobecker
2003-12-02  4:30 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2003-12-02  6:06   ` Joel Brobecker
2003-12-02  6:35 ` Richard Henderson
2003-12-02  7:21   ` Joel Brobecker
2003-12-02 15:14     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-12-03  1:54       ` Joel Brobecker
2003-12-02 13:55   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-12-03  4:19 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-12-04  0:55   ` Joel Brobecker
2003-12-04  1:49     ` Andrew Cagney
2003-12-04 23:24       ` Joel Brobecker
2003-12-04 23:28         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-12-05 20:19         ` Andrew Cagney
2003-12-08 23:25           ` Joel Brobecker
2003-12-09 23:10             ` Andrew Cagney
2003-12-02  5:49 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-12-02  7:53 Michael Elizabeth Chastain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20031202043042.GA12528@nevyn.them.org \
    --to=drow@mvista.com \
    --cc=brobecker@gnat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox