From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5257 invoked by alias); 30 Nov 2003 05:46:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 5250 invoked from network); 30 Nov 2003 05:46:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO fred.ninemoons.com) (68.14.214.217) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 30 Nov 2003 05:46:47 -0000 Received: from fred.ninemoons.com (fred.ninemoons.com [127.0.0.1]) by fred.ninemoons.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hAU5kEXj001640; Sat, 29 Nov 2003 22:46:14 -0700 Received: (from fnf@localhost) by fred.ninemoons.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id hAU5kDiR001638; Sat, 29 Nov 2003 22:46:13 -0700 From: Fred Fish Message-Id: <200311300546.hAU5kDiR001638@fred.ninemoons.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] use "verbose" for notification of not running a test To: drow@mvista.com (Daniel Jacobowitz) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 05:46:00 -0000 Cc: fnf@ninemoons.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Reply-To: fnf@ninemoons.com In-Reply-To: <20031129232920.GA25398@nevyn.them.org> from "Daniel Jacobowitz" at Nov 29, 2003 06:29:20 PM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2003-11/txt/msg00628.txt.bz2 > The asm-source.exp suppression was left messy to encourage people to > write the appropriate wrappers; it's really not hard to do. OK, I understand the reasoning for the first suppression. The second part of the patch is to shut up the testsuite when it can't handle multilibs, which from the comment in the test file looks like it would take significant work to support and isn't just a "per target" issue. Perhaps in this case it is more appropriate to just silently skip the test. -Fred