From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4137 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2003 21:06:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 4128 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2003 21:06:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO takamaka.act-europe.fr) (142.179.108.108) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Nov 2003 21:06:23 -0000 Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id A1B0B47D5B; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 13:06:22 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 21:06:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Andrew Cagney Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Daniel Jacobowitz , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [commit] Deprecate remaining STREQ uses Message-ID: <20031124210622.GK857@gnat.com> References: <3FC119EB.1060102@gnu.org> <3FC234C0.1000500@gnu.org> <20031124165047.GA2227@nevyn.them.org> <9003-Mon24Nov2003213315+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> <3FC262DE.5080308@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3FC262DE.5080308@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2003-11/txt/msg00548.txt.bz2 > BTW, coff (not xcoff) support which is where (ignoring ada, hi joel) I will take care of removing all STREQ* usage from our ada-specific files. This update will then be contributed when we are finally ready to merge our sources into your tree. Note, this raise another question: I consider that the Ada experience that we started a year ago (or maybe even longer) has failed. Since then, the ada-specific files tend to suffer from bitrot, and I presume that they also sometimes cause a small maintenance overhead when large changes such as this one are done. Shouldn't it make better sense to simply remove this file for now? It can be added back when we deliver. -- Joel