From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2281 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2003 21:04:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2232 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2003 21:04:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Nov 2003 21:04:38 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.24 #1 (Debian)) id 1AONss-0004u7-1K for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 16:04:38 -0500 Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 21:04:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfc/testsuite/c++] c2.exp, new script for class lookup Message-ID: <20031124210438.GB18827@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20031124210257.C9CC54B409@berman.michael-chastain.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031124210257.C9CC54B409@berman.michael-chastain.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-11/txt/msg00547.txt.bz2 On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 04:02:57PM -0500, Michael Chastain wrote: > mec> I'm not completely happy with the name "c2" ("class 2"). > > dc> I would prefer either 'class2' or naming it after the PR > dc> to just calling it 'c2'. > > gdb1465.exp would be bad because I'm planning to add more stuff to it > after gdb/1465 is fixed. (I can't add it yet because there are too many > FAILs and it's a pain to analyze each one and figure out if it's really > a manifestation of 1465). > > class2.exp is okay with me if nothing else turns up. That sounds good to me too. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer