From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 981 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2003 21:02:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 968 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2003 21:02:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mclean.mail.mindspring.net) (207.69.200.57) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Nov 2003 21:02:53 -0000 Received: from user-119a90a.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.36.10] helo=berman.michael-chastain.com) by mclean.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1AONr9-0003lY-00; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 16:02:51 -0500 Received: by berman.michael-chastain.com (Postfix, from userid 502) id C9CC54B409; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 16:02:57 -0500 (EST) To: carlton@kealia.com Subject: Re: [rfc/testsuite/c++] c2.exp, new script for class lookup Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Message-Id: <20031124210257.C9CC54B409@berman.michael-chastain.com> Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 21:02:00 -0000 From: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) X-SW-Source: 2003-11/txt/msg00545.txt.bz2 mec> I'm not completely happy with the name "c2" ("class 2"). dc> I would prefer either 'class2' or naming it after the PR dc> to just calling it 'c2'. gdb1465.exp would be bad because I'm planning to add more stuff to it after gdb/1465 is fixed. (I can't add it yet because there are too many FAILs and it's a pain to analyze each one and figure out if it's really a manifestation of 1465). class2.exp is okay with me if nothing else turns up. Michael C