From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18241 invoked by alias); 21 Nov 2003 20:48:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18231 invoked from network); 21 Nov 2003 20:48:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 21 Nov 2003 20:48:34 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.24 #1 (Debian)) id 1ANICf-0000cv-MQ; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 15:48:33 -0500 Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 20:48:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa:symtab] deprecate inside_entry_func Message-ID: <20031121204833.GA2356@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Cagney , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <3FA2F940.5040102@redhat.com> <3FBE6D46.4070201@redhat.com> <20031121195949.GA794@nevyn.them.org> <3FBE79B6.2090209@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3FBE79B6.2090209@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-11/txt/msg00446.txt.bz2 On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 03:46:46PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: > > > >What Kevin and I have both repeatedly suggested, I think, is: > > - Do not deprecate inside_entry_func; fix it if you don't like the > > way it is implemented. Change the implementation. > > - Deprecate entry_func_lowpc and entry_func_highpc (there's a typo in > > your changelog, two lowpc's) if you really want to deprecate > > something. > > Please point me at a legitimate use of this function. Please read my previous response to you in this thread, in which I did so at length. http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2003-11/msg00158.html -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer