From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9008 invoked by alias); 20 Nov 2003 22:46:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 9001 invoked from network); 20 Nov 2003 22:46:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO walton.kettenis.dyndns.org) (213.93.115.144) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 20 Nov 2003 22:46:38 -0000 Received: from elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org [192.168.0.2]) by walton.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.6p3/8.12.6) with ESMTP id hAKMkUWC000452; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 23:46:30 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from kettenis@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org) Received: from elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.6p3/8.12.6) with ESMTP id hAKMkUsW014640; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 23:46:30 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from kettenis@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org) Received: (from kettenis@localhost) by elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.6p3/8.12.6/Submit) id hAKMkTmT014637; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 23:46:29 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 22:46:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200311202246.hAKMkTmT014637@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> From: Mark Kettenis To: ac131313@redhat.com CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <3FBD069F.9000504@redhat.com> (message from Andrew Cagney on Thu, 20 Nov 2003 13:23:27 -0500) Subject: Re: [rfa/x86-64] Supress x86-64 structs.exp test? References: <3FBD069F.9000504@redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2003-11/txt/msg00434.txt.bz2 Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 13:23:27 -0500 From: Andrew Cagney I just ran the new structs.exp on amd64. Turns out amd digs a hole so deep that GDB gets stuck in free fall (an infinite loop resuming the target?). The attached supresses the testfile until someone gets the chance to see whats really happening. Hmm, I just get a bunch of internal errors on FreeBSD/amd64. The internal errors are caused by some missing check_typedefs. We could add some stopgap fixes. However, AMD64 needs some serious work here. I intend to convert it to use return_value such that it coreectly stores return values too. Meanwhile, I've got no objection If you'd like to check in this patch. I'll revert it when I've checked in the appropriate fixes. Mark 2003-11-20 Andrew Cagney * gdb.base/structs.exp: Suppress when "x86_64-*-*".