From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10013 invoked by alias); 14 Nov 2003 04:22:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10002 invoked from network); 14 Nov 2003 04:22:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 14 Nov 2003 04:22:24 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.24 #1 (Debian)) id 1AKVTT-0004L4-Lh for ; Thu, 13 Nov 2003 23:22:23 -0500 Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 04:22:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] new test for separate debug info Message-ID: <20031114042223.GA16650@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20031113175555.9EE3F4B3FA@berman.michael-chastain.com> <16308.4229.580092.722132@localhost.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <16308.4229.580092.722132@localhost.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-11/txt/msg00286.txt.bz2 On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 06:15:17PM -0500, Elena Zannoni wrote: > > 3rd reply to the same mail...:-) > > ok, How about this behavior? > > Running /to/scratch/ezannoni/pristine/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/sepdebug.exp ... > ERROR: couldn't load /to/scratch/ezannoni/pristine/tomago/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/sepdebug.dbglnk into /to/scratch/ezannoni/pristine/tomago/gdb/testsuite/../../gdb/gdb. Does it make sense to use this same mechanism with stabs? i.e. should we be testing it, which implies trying to fix it, or document it as a bad idea and let it go. I can see either. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer