From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18504 invoked by alias); 13 Nov 2003 16:49:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18496 invoked from network); 13 Nov 2003 16:49:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO blount.mail.mindspring.net) (207.69.200.226) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 13 Nov 2003 16:49:12 -0000 Received: from user-119a90a.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.36.10] helo=berman.michael-chastain.com) by blount.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1AKKea-0003Hg-00; Thu, 13 Nov 2003 11:49:08 -0500 Received: by berman.michael-chastain.com (Postfix, from userid 502) id 161C84B3FA; Thu, 13 Nov 2003 11:49:13 -0500 (EST) To: ac131313@redhat.com, ezannoni@redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] new test for separate debug info Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Message-Id: <20031113164913.161C84B3FA@berman.michael-chastain.com> Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 16:49:00 -0000 From: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) X-SW-Source: 2003-11/txt/msg00263.txt.bz2 ac> FWIW, I think cloning "break.c" is a good idea. It avoids the problem ac> of someone wanting to change/modify that test being landed with the task ac> of changing/modifying N other tests. Me too. I agree with Andrew's view. Michael C