From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8559 invoked by alias); 12 Nov 2003 22:29:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 8543 invoked from network); 12 Nov 2003 22:29:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 12 Nov 2003 22:29:47 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.24 #1 (Debian)) id 1AK3Ug-00012O-Id for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2003 17:29:46 -0500 Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 22:29:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] new test for separate debug info Message-ID: <20031112222946.GA17593@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <16306.45204.331370.977021@localhost.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <16306.45204.331370.977021@localhost.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-11/txt/msg00245.txt.bz2 On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 05:13:40PM -0500, Elena Zannoni wrote: > > Ok, I think I addresed all of the comments. Here are the 2 files, in > their entirety. However, since they are clones of break.c and > break.exp, I just added, for your viewing pleasure, a diff between > break.exp and sepdebug.exp. > > 2003-11-12 Elena Zannoni > > * gdb.base/sepdebug.exp: New test for separate debug info files. > * gdb.base/sepdebug.c: New source file for the above. > * lib/gdb.exp (separate_debug_filename): New procedure. > (gdb_gnu_strip_debug): New procedure. FWIW, this looks great to me. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer