From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3659 invoked by alias); 12 Nov 2003 02:18:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 3650 invoked from network); 12 Nov 2003 02:18:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 12 Nov 2003 02:18:26 -0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (nat-pool-rdu-dmz.redhat.com [172.16.52.200] (may be forged)) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id hAC2IQM13987 for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 21:18:26 -0500 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id hAC2IOa29604; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 21:18:24 -0500 Received: from dot.sfbay.redhat.com (dot.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.7]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id hAC2INR24397; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 18:18:23 -0800 Received: (from rth@localhost) by dot.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id hAC2IHV27231; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 18:18:17 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: dot.sfbay.redhat.com: rth set sender to rth@redhat.com using -f Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 02:18:00 -0000 From: Richard Henderson To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, "J. Johnston" Subject: Re: [commit] Order parameters "rw", not "wr" Message-ID: <20031112021817.GA27225@redhat.com> References: <3FB0010D.7040108@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3FB0010D.7040108@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2003-11/txt/msg00233.txt.bz2 On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 04:20:13PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: > The attached patch re-orders the xfer_partial interface so its > read/write buffers are ordered read/write (i.e., sanely). Eh?? The entire standard C library uses write/read. I don't see what's so unusual or non-canonical about it... r~