From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2860 invoked by alias); 11 Nov 2003 17:10:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2848 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2003 17:10:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp10.atl.mindspring.net) (207.69.200.246) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 11 Nov 2003 17:10:31 -0000 Received: from user-119a90a.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.36.10] helo=berman.michael-chastain.com) by smtp10.atl.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1AJc1f-0004gm-00; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 12:09:59 -0500 Received: by berman.michael-chastain.com (Postfix, from userid 502) id 3CB4C4B361; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 12:09:54 -0500 (EST) To: ezannoni@redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfc] msymbol.size Cc: brobecker@gnat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Message-Id: <20031111170954.3CB4C4B361@berman.michael-chastain.com> Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 17:10:00 -0000 From: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) X-SW-Source: 2003-11/txt/msg00217.txt.bz2 I have an idea. I'm going to try this: end_psymtab () { printf_unfiltered (MSYMBOL_SIZE(...)); if (... stuff that never happens for us ...) { ... whatever ...; } } I can check that MSYMBOL_SIZE is the same before and after my patch. I don't actually need to execute the code path that *uses* MSYMBOL_SIZE. See you in a couple of hours or tomorrow. eza> I hope this was clear, on Solaris I got no differences in the pthreads eza> tests before and after the patch. There were failures in the eza> backtraces, but they were failing the same way in both runs. But Joel eza> did. Right. Michael C