From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12081 invoked by alias); 9 Nov 2003 03:50:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 12074 invoked from network); 9 Nov 2003 03:50:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Nov 2003 03:50:02 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.24 #1 (Debian)) id 1AIgaP-0001Fw-Py; Sat, 08 Nov 2003 22:50:01 -0500 Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2003 03:50:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa:symtab] deprecate inside_entry_func Message-ID: <20031109035001.GA4807@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Cagney , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <3FA2F940.5040102@redhat.com> <20031101004233.GA11987@nevyn.them.org> <3FA31C64.9060306@gnu.org> <20031109001258.GA1138@nevyn.them.org> <3FADA567.6090401@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3FADA567.6090401@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-11/txt/msg00163.txt.bz2 On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 09:24:39PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: > >I believe the function should be fixed and re-enabled, not deleted. > > So you agree then, that the existing code / mechanism should go > (replaced by "A very simple test, such as get_frame_func == entry_point"). Sure. I'm just saying that I disagree with your patch; the comment about ABI breakage is dubious, and deprecating a function that we should repair doesn't seem to have any point. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer