From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7503 invoked by alias); 7 Nov 2003 20:21:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 7486 invoked from network); 7 Nov 2003 20:21:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO concert.shout.net) (204.253.184.25) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 Nov 2003 20:21:42 -0000 Received: from duracef.shout.net (duracef.shout.net [204.253.184.12]) by concert.shout.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hA7KLfXw014566; Fri, 7 Nov 2003 14:21:41 -0600 Received: from duracef.shout.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by duracef.shout.net (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hA7KLefa024926; Fri, 7 Nov 2003 14:21:40 -0600 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) id hA7KLeCY024925; Fri, 7 Nov 2003 15:21:40 -0500 Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 20:21:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200311072021.hA7KLeCY024925@duracef.shout.net> To: ezannoni@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC/WIP] unit test for separate debug info X-SW-Source: 2003-11/txt/msg00128.txt.bz2 > (BTW, should cloned files retain the original copyright years?) I believe so. > Anyway, this needs some pounding by Michael, I think. There probably > are improvements/changes that could be made. Okay, I'll jump on it! Michael C