From: Kevin Nomura <nomura@netapp.com>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: inconsistent sigtramp code in mips target
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 21:58:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031028215814.GY4320@bughouse.netapp.com> (raw)
gdb 6.0, file gdb/mips-tdep.c, function mips_find_saved_regs:
There are calls to "set_reg_offset" in a loop, followed by
some individual calls after the loop. The latter have
no effect if the register was processed in the loop
(see the code for set_reg_offset). SP_REGNUM is like this,
but PC_REGNUM is not, because of the particular values of
these constants (ugh).
if ((get_frame_type (fci) == SIGTRAMP_FRAME))
{
for (ireg = 0; ireg < MIPS_NUMREGS; ireg++)
{
CORE_ADDR reg_position = (get_frame_base (fci) + SIGFRAME_REGSAVE_OFF
+ ireg * SIGFRAME_REG_SIZE);
set_reg_offset (saved_regs, ireg, reg_position);
}
for (ireg = 0; ireg < MIPS_NUMREGS; ireg++)
{
CORE_ADDR reg_position = (get_frame_base (fci)
+ SIGFRAME_FPREGSAVE_OFF
+ ireg * SIGFRAME_REG_SIZE);
set_reg_offset (saved_regs, FP0_REGNUM + ireg, reg_position);
}
set_reg_offset (saved_regs, PC_REGNUM, get_frame_base (fci) + SIGFRAME_PC_OFF);
/* SP_REGNUM, contains the value and not the address. */
set_reg_offset (saved_regs, SP_REGNUM, get_frame_base (fci));
return;
}
The logical patch would be to move the special cases up front,
but I have no way to test this out (no access to a MIPS UNIX
platform).
On the other hand this isn't purely academic. I came across this
because I need to define a custom sigtramp frame for our own
MIPS embedded platform. It was baffling for a while that my
modification to the SP_REGNUM override had no effect.
next reply other threads:[~2003-10-28 21:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-28 21:58 Kevin Nomura [this message]
2003-10-29 22:27 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-10-29 22:30 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-10-29 22:43 ` Kevin Nomura
2003-10-29 22:50 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031028215814.GY4320@bughouse.netapp.com \
--to=nomura@netapp.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox