From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10139 invoked by alias); 24 Oct 2003 19:20:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10132 invoked from network); 24 Oct 2003 19:20:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO concert.shout.net) (204.253.184.25) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Oct 2003 19:20:36 -0000 Received: from duracef.shout.net (duracef.shout.net [204.253.184.12]) by concert.shout.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id h9OJKYIr000729; Fri, 24 Oct 2003 14:20:34 -0500 Received: from duracef.shout.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by duracef.shout.net (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h9OJKYfa024281; Fri, 24 Oct 2003 14:20:34 -0500 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) id h9OJKYwA024280; Fri, 24 Oct 2003 15:20:34 -0400 Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 19:20:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200310241920.h9OJKYwA024280@duracef.shout.net> To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, kewarken@qnx.com Subject: Re: [patch] New testcase for PR:1291 X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg00749.txt.bz2 Copyright nagging: gdb1291.c needs either a copyright notice, or an explicit notice that copyright has been abandoned and the file is in the public domain. (gcc has a policy that they want bug reports to include pre-processed C source, which means all the comments were gone. But we have no such policy. Instead, we have a policy that all files longer than 10 lines must have copyright notices, including test files). Also, Andrew says that the preferred incantation is "this file is part of gdb", not "this file is part of the gdb test suite". Other than that, I don't have any stylistic complaints. Lightly proofread. Not tested. Busy day for me. :( Michael C Changelog: 2003-10-24 Kris Warkentin * gdb.arch/gdb1291.c: New test file. * gdb.arch/gdb1291.exp: New test script.