From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19821 invoked by alias); 24 Oct 2003 17:59:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 19814 invoked from network); 24 Oct 2003 17:59:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Oct 2003 17:59:37 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.24 #1 (Debian)) id 1AD6Do-0008L6-II; Fri, 24 Oct 2003 13:59:36 -0400 Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 17:59:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Kris Warkentin Cc: "Gdb-Patches@Sources.Redhat.Com" Subject: Re: [patch] New testcase for PR:1291 Message-ID: <20031024175936.GA32002@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Kris Warkentin , "Gdb-Patches@Sources.Redhat.Com" References: <083101c39a45$57631cc0$0202040a@catdog> <20031024155907.GB27261@nevyn.them.org> <089601c39a55$8d1de470$0202040a@catdog> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <089601c39a55$8d1de470$0202040a@catdog> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg00745.txt.bz2 On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 01:37:52PM -0400, Kris Warkentin wrote: > > > main() > > > { > > > sub1(); > > > sub2(); > > > } > > > > A test which looks like this should not, I think, go in gdb.arch or be > > skipped for non-SH. What you may want to do is leave it where it is > > and write the testcase in assembly - that's what the gdb.arch directory > > is for. See i386-prolouge.c. > > I think I need an executive decision here. > > A) move it and make it generic. > B) leave it and write it in assembly. > > Pick one. Either's fine with me; Elena liked the test you posted so go ahead. Just stick it in gdb.base? -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer