Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@chello.nl>
To: carlton@kealia.com
Cc: jimb@redhat.com, ac131313@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: RFA: osabi: correct test for compatible handlers
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 15:39:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200310231538.h9NFch0a000511@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <yf28yncg8dx.fsf@hawaii.kealia.com> (message from David Carlton on Wed, 22 Oct 2003 16:28:10 -0700)

   From: David Carlton <carlton@kealia.com>
   Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 16:28:10 -0700

   On 22 Oct 2003 18:16:31 -0500, Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com> said:

   > But I think it's easier to see what the *resulting code* does with
   > the function in place.  We should put the readability of the
   > resultant code above readability of the change.  You say, "A can use
   > a handler for B if A can run code for B", and then you can make a
   > separate check to see whether can_run_code_for is correct.

   I very much agree with this.

Being the person who got the test wrong in the first place I say:
Definitely!

Mark


  reply	other threads:[~2003-10-23 15:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-10-21 22:23 Jim Blandy
2003-10-22 19:09 ` Andrew Cagney
     [not found]   ` <vt23cdlvy21 dot fsf at zenia dot home>
     [not found]     ` <3F970598 dot 9020908 at redhat dot com>
2003-10-22 19:11   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-10-22 19:33     ` Andrew Cagney
2003-10-22 20:04   ` Jim Blandy
2003-10-22 22:32     ` Andrew Cagney
2003-10-22 23:16       ` Jim Blandy
2003-10-22 23:28         ` David Carlton
2003-10-23 15:39           ` Mark Kettenis [this message]
2003-10-23 21:20             ` Jim Blandy
2003-10-23  1:29         ` Andrew Cagney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200310231538.h9NFch0a000511@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org \
    --to=kettenis@chello.nl \
    --cc=ac131313@redhat.com \
    --cc=carlton@kealia.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=jimb@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox