From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22205 invoked by alias); 20 Oct 2003 23:51:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 22183 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2003 23:51:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO takamaka.act-europe.fr) (142.179.108.108) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 20 Oct 2003 23:51:58 -0000 Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id 00918D2D29; Mon, 20 Oct 2003 16:51:57 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 23:51:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, dj@redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] libiberty/cplus-dem.c:demangle_template() problem? Message-ID: <20031020235157.GU986@gnat.com> References: <20031019055940.GD986@gnat.com> <20031020232753.GQ986@gnat.com> <3F9472B5.4010807@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3F9472B5.4010807@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg00630.txt.bz2 > >I just committed the following change to libiberty in the GCC tree. > >Apparently, the libiberty repository is not "shared" between GCC and > >GDB. This fixes a SIGSEGV that occured in GDB. Is it ok to import > >this change in the GDB sources? > > Yes. Any dj approved upstream change to gcc/libiberty is implicitly > approved for src/libiberty. OK, thank you both for clarifying how it works. I just checked the change in src as well. -- Joel