From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32639 invoked by alias); 15 Oct 2003 20:08:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 32632 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2003 20:08:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 15 Oct 2003 20:08:51 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.24 #1 (Debian)) id 1A9rwx-0008NM-1L for ; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 16:08:51 -0400 Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 20:08:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH/SPARC-branch] Make call dummies on non-executable stack work Message-ID: <20031015200850.GA22857@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <200310151957.h9FJvfwc000383@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200310151957.h9FJvfwc000383@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg00501.txt.bz2 On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 09:57:41PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > The attached patch makes call dummies on a non-executable stack > working. I checked this in on my SPARC branch. What do people think > about checking this in on mainline? I don't thinkthis will get much > exposure on the branch. It looks good for mainline to me, too. > Index: ChangeLog > from Mark Kettenis > > * infrun.c (handle_inferior_event): Allow for breakpoint > instructions to generate a SIGSEGV in addition to SIGTRAP, SIGILL > and SIGEMT. Update comments. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer