From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-27922-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 24126 invoked by alias); 15 Oct 2003 08:56:17 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 24118 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2003 08:56:16 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com) (193.131.176.58)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 15 Oct 2003 08:56:16 -0000
Received: from pc960.cambridge.arm.com (pc960.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.205.4])
	by cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA05961;
	Wed, 15 Oct 2003 09:56:08 +0100 (BST)
Received: from pc960.cambridge.arm.com (rearnsha@localhost)
	by pc960.cambridge.arm.com (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id h9F8u8f27915;
	Wed, 15 Oct 2003 09:56:08 +0100
Message-Id: <200310150856.h9F8u8f27915@pc960.cambridge.arm.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: pc960.cambridge.arm.com: rearnsha owned process doing -bs
To: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>
cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, nickc@redhat.com, rearnsha@arm.com
Reply-To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com
Organization: ARM Ltd.
X-Telephone: +44 1223 400569 (direct+voicemail), +44 1223 400400 (switchbd)
X-Fax: +44 1223 400410
X-Address: ARM Ltd., 110 Fulbourn Road, Cherry Hinton, Cambridge CB1 9NJ.
X-Url: http://www.arm.com/
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] coffread.c: delete param 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 14 Oct 2003 17:52:55 EDT."
             <16268.28727.18741.65995@localhost.redhat.com> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 08:56:00 -0000
From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg00483.txt.bz2

> 
> Based on the discussion in this thread:
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2003-10/msg00405.html
> 
> I don't have a set up to test this, though. It does build, that's all
> I can say.
> 
> [Richard, Nick, this does affect arm-coff]
> 

I really couldn't say.  I don't think I've ever built an arm-coff target.  
It was something added for one of Red Hat's customers.

R.