From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28973 invoked by alias); 14 Oct 2003 06:53:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28959 invoked from network); 14 Oct 2003 06:53:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 14 Oct 2003 06:53:35 -0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h9E6ZiO16672 for ; Tue, 14 Oct 2003 02:35:44 -0400 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h9E6rXL29167 for ; Tue, 14 Oct 2003 02:53:33 -0400 Received: from dot.sfbay.redhat.com (dot.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.7]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h9E6rXJ30282 for ; Mon, 13 Oct 2003 23:53:33 -0700 Received: (from rth@localhost) by dot.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h9E6rW827346 for gdb-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Mon, 13 Oct 2003 23:53:32 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: dot.sfbay.redhat.com: rth set sender to rth@redhat.com using -f Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 06:53:00 -0000 From: Richard Henderson To: gdb-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [RFA] print function arguments for g95 Message-ID: <20031014065331.GA27340@redhat.com> References: <20031013085319.GA865@twiddle.net> <20031013160601.GA21537@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031013160601.GA21537@nevyn.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg00442.txt.bz2 On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 12:06:01PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > Does f_type_print_base take care of printing a closing paren or do you > need one here? f_type_print_varspec_suffix does it. And there was already an entry for TYPE_CODE_REF there. r~