From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-27755-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 29511 invoked by alias); 9 Oct 2003 20:23:47 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 29497 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2003 20:23:46 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Oct 2003 20:23:46 -0000
Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.22 #1 (Debian))
	id 1A7hJz-0005vZ-8E; Thu, 09 Oct 2003 16:23:39 -0400
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 20:23:00 -0000
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>, Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>,
	Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: unwind support for Linux 2.6 vsyscall DSO
Message-ID: <20031009202339.GA22732@nevyn.them.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>,
	Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>, Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>,
	Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
References: <200310070445.h974jrd1020409@magilla.sf.frob.com> <1031009195805.ZM14115@localhost.localdomain> <20031009200224.GA21068@nevyn.them.org> <1031009202102.ZM14243@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1031009202102.ZM14243@localhost.localdomain>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i
X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg00316.txt.bz2

On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 01:21:02PM -0700, Kevin Buettner wrote:
> On Oct 9,  4:02pm, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> 
> > The problem with using SOLIB_ADD for this is that we can't SOLIB_ADD
> > safely till we hit the dynamic linker breakpoint, but it would be
> > _really_ nice to be able to load this object right after the inferior
> > starts (and for static binaries, etc etc).  How would you suggets we do
> > that?
> 
> I think that's what TARGET_CREATE_INFERIOR_HOOK is for.

Sounds good to me.

By the way, assuming I remember this correctly, the DSO will _also_
show up in the link map we get from the dynamic loader.  Not sure how
that will influence things.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer