From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16715 invoked by alias); 9 Oct 2003 00:55:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16708 invoked from network); 9 Oct 2003 00:55:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gateway.sf.frob.com) (64.81.54.130) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Oct 2003 00:55:17 -0000 Received: from magilla.sf.frob.com (magilla.sf.frob.com [198.49.250.228]) by gateway.sf.frob.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09739357B; Wed, 8 Oct 2003 17:55:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from magilla.sf.frob.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by magilla.sf.frob.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h990tFN2012609; Wed, 8 Oct 2003 17:55:15 -0700 Received: (from roland@localhost) by magilla.sf.frob.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h990tFVt012605; Wed, 8 Oct 2003 17:55:15 -0700 Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 00:55:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200310090055.h990tFVt012605@magilla.sf.frob.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Roland McGrath To: Michael Snyder Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] target_read_aux_vector In-Reply-To: Michael Snyder's message of Wednesday, 8 October 2003 17:51:19 -0700 <3F84B107.9080008@redhat.com> X-Antipastobozoticataclysm: Bariumenemanilow X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg00286.txt.bz2 > In fact (now that you mention it), I though I understood that > [PATCH] means "I have applied this patch", as opposed to > "please review my patch". But what the heck, are these conventions > even written down anywhere? If there are special conventions for this mailing list, I am not aware of them and would appreciate a pointer. In the rest of the world, the "[PATCH]" prefix means, "This message contains a patch that actually compiles and kind of works for me, not just me talking out of my ass and maybe pasting in some random code."