From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21284 invoked by alias); 7 Oct 2003 22:55:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21276 invoked from network); 7 Oct 2003 22:55:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 Oct 2003 22:55:24 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.22 #1 (Debian)) id 1A70ji-0003Ra-OT for ; Tue, 07 Oct 2003 18:55:22 -0400 Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2003 22:55:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] more sed fixes for Makefile.in Message-ID: <20031007225522.GB13082@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg00179.txt.bz2 On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 03:38:17PM -0700, Theodore A. Roth wrote: > Jim B's post got me looking at Makefile.in again. > > In my previous patch, > > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2003-07/msg00249.html > > I think I should have also made the changes in the attached patch. > > Ok to commit? I think so. GCC uses $$t in some places and '$(program_transform_name)' directly in others, but from what I know about shell quoting your change looks correct. Go ahead if no on objects in the next day or so. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer