From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-27564-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 8573 invoked by alias); 6 Oct 2003 21:09:47 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 8560 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2003 21:09:41 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO walton.kettenis.dyndns.org) (213.93.115.144)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 6 Oct 2003 21:09:41 -0000
Received: from elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org [192.168.0.2])
	by walton.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.6p3/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h96L9XFY000257;
	Mon, 6 Oct 2003 23:09:33 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from kettenis@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org)
Received: from elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.6p3/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h96L9X4i000484;
	Mon, 6 Oct 2003 23:09:33 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from kettenis@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org)
Received: (from kettenis@localhost)
	by elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.6p3/8.12.6/Submit) id h96L9Waq000481;
	Mon, 6 Oct 2003 23:09:32 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2003 21:09:00 -0000
Message-Id: <200310062109.h96L9Waq000481@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org>
From: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@chello.nl>
To: kevinb@redhat.com
CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
In-reply-to: <1031006153657.ZM11197@localhost.localdomain> (message from Kevin
	Buettner on Mon, 6 Oct 2003 08:36:58 -0700)
Subject: Re: [RFC] TARGET_ADJUST_BREAKPOINT_ADDRESS - patch 1 of 4
References: <1031004002813.ZM24546@localhost.localdomain> 
	<200310061249.h96CnP6f000466@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <1031006153657.ZM11197@localhost.localdomain>
X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg00125.txt.bz2

   Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 08:36:58 -0700
   From: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>

   On Oct 6,  2:49pm, Mark Kettenis wrote:

   >    The patch below should be non-controversial.  It merely adds the
   >    TARGET_ADJUST_BREAKPOINT_ADDRESS method.  Code which uses it (the
   >    possibly controversial bit) will come in patch #3.  Documentation will
   >    be in the next patch, #2.  Finally, target specific code which
   >    requires TARGET_ADJUST_BREAKPOINT_ADDRESS will be posted in patch #4.
   > 
   > Do we really need the "TARGET" in the name of the new method?  It made
   > me think that this was something that was going to be added to the
   > target-vector instead of the architecture vector.

   How about just "ADJUST_BREAKPOINT_ADDRESS" ?

Sounds fine to me :-).  Thanks,

Mark