Re: [RFC] TARGET_ADJUST_BREAKPOINT_ADDRESS - patch 1 of 4

Andrew Cagney
2003-10-06T14:37:55Z

> Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 17:28:13 -0700
> From: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
>
> The patch below should be non-controversial. It merely adds the
> TARGET_ADJUST_BREAKPOINT_ADDRESS method. Code which uses it (the
> possibly controversial bit) will come in patch #3. Documentation will
> be in the next patch, #2. Finally, target specific code which
> requires TARGET_ADJUST_BREAKPOINT_ADDRESS will be posted in patch #4.
>
> Do we really need the "TARGET" in the name of the new method? It made
> me think that this was something that was going to be added to the
> target-vector instead of the architecture vector.

Good point (making note that the term 'target architecture' really
doesn't make sense).

Andrew