Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Cc: msnyder@redhat.com, kettenis@gnu.org
Subject: Re: RFC: patch to lin-lwp.c
Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2003 21:41:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031004214120.GA24856@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3F3136AD.4010300@redhat.com>

This patch was never reviewed as far as I can see.  I just got a bug
report that I think it would fix...

Mark, you've said that you don't feel comfortable maintaining the
Linux-specific threading layer, is that recollection right?  Michael,
do you?  If not, I'd like to clearly indicate who can approve patches
to lin-lwp.c.

On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 01:11:09PM -0400, J. Johnston wrote:
> Sorry, forgot to attach patch.
> 
> J. Johnston wrote:
> >The attached patch is created to deal with the problem as discussed on:
> >
> >  http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/2003-08/msg00043.html
> >
> >The fix does two things:
> >
> >  1. it sets the resumed flag for threads we stopped when the main thread
> >     exited and then resumed
> >  2. changes the running_callback to include threads that have events
> >     pending on them that will be caught on the next wait
> >
> >Ok to commit?
> >
> >-- Jeff J.
> >
> >2003-08-05  Jeff Johnston  <jjohnstn@redhat.com>
> >
> >    * lin-lwp-wait.c (stop_and_resume_callback): Set the resumed flag
> >    for any lwp we resume.
> >    (running_callback): Add lwps that have pending status events
> >    against them to be considered running.
> >
> >
> >
> 

> Index: lin-lwp.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/lin-lwp.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.47
> diff -u -r1.47 lin-lwp.c
> --- lin-lwp.c	19 Jun 2003 22:52:03 -0000	1.47
> +++ lin-lwp.c	5 Aug 2003 23:09:55 -0000
> @@ -839,7 +839,7 @@
>  static int
>  running_callback (struct lwp_info *lp, void *data)
>  {
> -  return (lp->stopped == 0);
> +  return (lp->stopped == 0 || (lp->status != 0 && lp->resumed));
>  }
>  
>  /* Count the LWP's that have had events.  */
> @@ -1087,7 +1087,10 @@
>        /* Resume if the lwp still exists.  */
>        for (ptr = lwp_list; ptr; ptr = ptr->next)
>  	if (lp == ptr)
> -	  resume_callback (lp, NULL);
> +	  {
> +	    resume_callback (lp, NULL);
> +	    resume_set_callback (lp, NULL);
> +	  }
>      }
>    return 0;
>  }


-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer


  reply	other threads:[~2003-10-04 21:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-08-05 23:22 J. Johnston
2003-08-06 17:11 ` J. Johnston
2003-10-04 21:41   ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2003-10-08  0:19     ` Michael Snyder
2003-10-08 17:57       ` Andrew Cagney
2003-10-08 18:00   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-10-08 20:07     ` J. Johnston

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20031004214120.GA24856@nevyn.them.org \
    --to=drow@mvista.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=kettenis@gnu.org \
    --cc=msnyder@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox