From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32713 invoked by alias); 2 Oct 2003 10:47:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 32702 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2003 10:47:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 2 Oct 2003 10:47:42 -0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (nat-pool-rdu-dmz.redhat.com [172.16.52.200] (may be forged)) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h92Alf128185 for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2003 06:47:41 -0400 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h92AleD09912 for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2003 06:47:40 -0400 Received: from cygbert.vinschen.de (vpn50-5.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.5]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h92AlXw07694 for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2003 03:47:33 -0700 Received: by cygbert.vinschen.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id 4A25358322; Thu, 2 Oct 2003 12:47:31 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2003 10:47:00 -0000 From: Corinna Vinschen To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: SH follow up, part 1 (was Re: [RFA] sh-tdep.c: Follow up patch to implement two different ABIs) Message-ID: <20031002104731.GS11435@cygbert.vinschen.de> Reply-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20030917161127.GM9981@cygbert.vinschen.de> <16240.45203.260059.116019@localhost.redhat.com> <20030924095552.GA8414@cygbert.vinschen.de> <16243.25282.58326.132364@localhost.redhat.com> <20030926111405.GG22787@cygbert.vinschen.de> <16251.15087.738125.813533@localhost.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <16251.15087.738125.813533@localhost.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg00027.txt.bz2 On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 04:37:03PM -0400, Elena Zannoni wrote: > No, but check in the patch with the changes corresponding to the > changelog entries below. > > After that, check in the reindentation, and add a new changelog entry > saying you ran it through gdb_indent.sh. Done. Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Cygwin Developer Red Hat, Inc.