From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6752 invoked by alias); 1 Oct 2003 04:12:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 6742 invoked from network); 1 Oct 2003 04:12:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO concert.shout.net) (204.253.184.25) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 1 Oct 2003 04:12:06 -0000 Received: from duracef.shout.net (duracef.shout.net [204.253.184.12]) by concert.shout.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id h914C2Om011337; Tue, 30 Sep 2003 23:12:02 -0500 Received: from duracef.shout.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by duracef.shout.net (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h914C2Vd004064; Tue, 30 Sep 2003 23:12:02 -0500 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) id h914C1ud004063; Wed, 1 Oct 2003 00:12:01 -0400 Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 04:12:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200310010412.h914C1ud004063@duracef.shout.net> To: jimb@redhat.com Subject: Re: RFA: Don't include value of expression in pc-fp.exp test name Cc: ac131313@redhat.com, carlton@kealia.com, fnasser@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg00000.txt.bz2 mec> Proofread. Tested on my test bed with 10 configurations. mec> All the gdb.sum's come out identical now. jimb> Fantastic. I think this deserves mention in NEWS. Jim's being facetious, I think, but it makes me realize that I should say: all the gdb.sum's for pc-fp.exp come out identical. There are still about 6 other files to hit. Michael C Nitpicky Bandwidth Waster === 2003-09-30 Jim Blandy * gdb.base/pc-fp.exp (get_valueofx): Don't include the value of the expression in the pass message. This just creates spurious differences in summary files.