Re: SH patch 2 (was Re: [RFA] SH: Deprecate deprecated functions, use new frame interface)

Corinna Vinschen
2003-09-24T08:43:18Z

On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 04:26:15PM -0400, Elena Zannoni wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen writes:
> > I don't think that's necessary. The results with dwarf2 unwinding are
> > 1 FAIL less than without dwarf2 unwinding. Removing the dwarf2
> > unwinding might result in forgetting it. Keeping it in will remind us
> > that the dwarf2 unwinder still needs a bit of work.
>
> I think so too. But I'd like to see if something can be done for SH
> similar to the i386_convert_register_p method.

Is that necessary before the patch gets approval or could that be added
in a follow up step?