From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28477 invoked by alias); 26 Sep 2003 11:32:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28468 invoked from network); 26 Sep 2003 11:32:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 Sep 2003 11:32:32 -0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (nat-pool-rdu-dmz.redhat.com [172.16.52.200] (may be forged)) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h8QBWV118328 for ; Fri, 26 Sep 2003 07:32:31 -0400 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h8QBWUD09479 for ; Fri, 26 Sep 2003 07:32:30 -0400 Received: from cygbert.vinschen.de (vpn50-38.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.38]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h8QBWTw29185 for ; Fri, 26 Sep 2003 04:32:29 -0700 Received: by cygbert.vinschen.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id 3D4C158319; Fri, 26 Sep 2003 13:32:28 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 11:32:00 -0000 From: Corinna Vinschen To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: SH patch 2 (was Re: [RFA] SH: Deprecate deprecated functions, use new frame interface) Message-ID: <20030926113228.GK22787@cygbert.vinschen.de> Reply-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <16231.17730.828347.741094@localhost.redhat.com> <20030916172606.GU9981@cygbert.vinschen.de> <20030916173038.GA25459@nevyn.them.org> <20030922143254.GR9981@cygbert.vinschen.de> <20030922144405.GA20343@nevyn.them.org> <20030922150831.GA17905@cygbert.vinschen.de> <16240.44135.87461.106684@localhost.redhat.com> <20030924084311.GF9981@cygbert.vinschen.de> <20030924112808.GI9981@cygbert.vinschen.de> <16243.18376.371969.84204@localhost.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <16243.18376.371969.84204@localhost.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00591.txt.bz2 On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 03:53:44PM -0400, Elena Zannoni wrote: > Corinna Vinschen writes: > > On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 10:43:11AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 04:26:15PM -0400, Elena Zannoni wrote: > > > > I think so too. But I'd like to see if something can be done for SH > > > > similar to the i386_convert_register_p method. > > > > > > Is that necessary before the patch gets approval or could that be added > > > in a follow up step? > > > > I've tested the below patch and the effect is absolut zero with respect to > > the store.exp results. What am I doing wrong? It doesn't matter if I > > diable the dwarf2 sniffer or not, btw. > > > > Did you try to find out where things go wrong? Not so far, no. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Cygwin Developer Red Hat, Inc.