From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4491 invoked by alias); 26 Sep 2003 10:20:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 4462 invoked from network); 26 Sep 2003 10:20:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com) (193.131.176.54) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 Sep 2003 10:20:40 -0000 Received: from pc960.cambridge.arm.com (pc960.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.205.4]) by cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA18891; Fri, 26 Sep 2003 11:20:29 +0100 (BST) Received: from pc960.cambridge.arm.com (rearnsha@localhost) by pc960.cambridge.arm.com (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id h8QAKT217012; Fri, 26 Sep 2003 11:20:29 +0100 Message-Id: <200309261020.h8QAKT217012@pc960.cambridge.arm.com> X-Authentication-Warning: pc960.cambridge.arm.com: rearnsha owned process doing -bs To: Jerome Guitton cc: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com, Andrew Cagney , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Reply-To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com Organization: ARM Ltd. X-Telephone: +44 1223 400569 (direct+voicemail), +44 1223 400400 (switchbd) X-Fax: +44 1223 400410 X-Address: ARM Ltd., 110 Fulbourn Road, Cherry Hinton, Cambridge CB1 9NJ. X-Url: http://www.arm.com/ Subject: Re: [RFA/RFC] ARM : one-line prologue analysis In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 26 Sep 2003 12:16:52 +0200." <20030926101652.GB12080@act-europe.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 10:20:00 -0000 From: Richard Earnshaw X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00586.txt.bz2 > Richard Earnshaw (rearnsha@arm.com): > > > > Would trad_frame_addr_p() be better? > > Agreed. > > > So approved with Andrew's suggested change. > > OK, I will check it in ASAP. Just to be sure that there is no > misunderstanding, this approval is for the first patch only, right? Actually, I think both patches are OK. R.