From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3804 invoked by alias); 26 Sep 2003 10:17:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 3795 invoked from network); 26 Sep 2003 10:17:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dublin.act-europe.fr) (212.157.227.154) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 Sep 2003 10:17:00 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by amavis.act-europe.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E5FF229E80; Fri, 26 Sep 2003 12:16:59 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from dublin.act-europe.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dublin.act-europe.fr [127.0.0.1:10024]) (amavisd-new) with ESMTP id 25604-05; Fri, 26 Sep 2003 12:16:54 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from berne.int.act-europe.fr (berne.act-europe.fr [10.10.0.165]) by dublin.act-europe.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0574229E7E; Fri, 26 Sep 2003 12:16:53 +0200 (MET DST) Received: by berne.int.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 560) id 20959592B; Fri, 26 Sep 2003 06:16:52 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 10:17:00 -0000 From: Jerome Guitton To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com Cc: Andrew Cagney , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA/RFC] ARM : one-line prologue analysis Message-ID: <20030926101652.GB12080@act-europe.fr> References: <3F735EEE.3060306@redhat.com> <200309260933.h8Q9X7w16542@pc960.cambridge.arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200309260933.h8Q9X7w16542@pc960.cambridge.arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00585.txt.bz2 Richard Earnshaw (rearnsha@arm.com): > > Would trad_frame_addr_p() be better? Agreed. > So approved with Andrew's suggested change. OK, I will check it in ASAP. Just to be sure that there is no misunderstanding, this approval is for the first patch only, right? -- Jerome