From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32102 invoked by alias); 23 Sep 2003 18:03:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 32084 invoked from network); 23 Sep 2003 18:03:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO concert.shout.net) (204.253.184.25) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 23 Sep 2003 18:03:43 -0000 Received: from duracef.shout.net (duracef.shout.net [204.253.184.12]) by concert.shout.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id h8NI3cBX019043; Tue, 23 Sep 2003 13:03:38 -0500 Received: from duracef.shout.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by duracef.shout.net (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h8NI3cVd026042; Tue, 23 Sep 2003 13:03:38 -0500 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) id h8NI3b2c026041; Tue, 23 Sep 2003 14:03:37 -0400 Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 18:03:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200309231803.h8NI3b2c026041@duracef.shout.net> To: carlton@kealia.com, jimb@redhat.com Subject: Re: RFA: test that GDB tolerates bad #inclusion data Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00496.txt.bz2 Jim, we gotta feed you the gdb_test_multiple kool-aid. See gdb1250.exp or float.exp or watchpoint.exp. Also, could you avoid the dependency on gcc version by using preprocessed ".i" files with the bad line numbers already in them? Instead of / in addition to the tests with C source. I will run this patch through my testbed with -g2 and -g3 (I do have -g3 capability, I just don't do it in the weeklies yet) and will post results in an hour or two. Michael C