From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20122 invoked by alias); 22 Sep 2003 15:08:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 20111 invoked from network); 22 Sep 2003 15:08:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 22 Sep 2003 15:08:41 -0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (nat-pool-rdu-dmz.redhat.com [172.16.52.200]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h8MF8e132295 for ; Mon, 22 Sep 2003 11:08:40 -0400 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h8MF8cD19313 for ; Mon, 22 Sep 2003 11:08:39 -0400 Received: from cygbert.vinschen.de (vpn50-51.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.51]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h8MF8bw07766 for ; Mon, 22 Sep 2003 08:08:37 -0700 Received: by cygbert.vinschen.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id 13442580A8; Mon, 22 Sep 2003 17:08:31 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 15:08:00 -0000 From: Corinna Vinschen To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: SH patch 2 (was Re: [RFA] SH: Deprecate deprecated functions, use new frame interface) Message-ID: <20030922150831.GA17905@cygbert.vinschen.de> Reply-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20030908165510.GK1859@cygbert.vinschen.de> <16226.1322.230352.450541@localhost.redhat.com> <20030915160111.GA9283@cygbert.vinschen.de> <16231.17730.828347.741094@localhost.redhat.com> <20030916172606.GU9981@cygbert.vinschen.de> <20030916173038.GA25459@nevyn.them.org> <20030922143254.GR9981@cygbert.vinschen.de> <20030922144405.GA20343@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030922144405.GA20343@nevyn.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00465.txt.bz2 On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 10:44:05AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 04:32:54PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > What does that mean? How does that affect the approval of my code > > as it is now? > > I can't answer the second question, but I can answer the first. > > DW_OP_piece is not supported yet. Kevin B. put together a nice little > patch for a strictly limited case of DW_OP_piece triggered by the > PowerPC e500 port; I don't know if this SH occurance is similar or a > more general usage. > > You may want to remove the bit which enables dwarf2 unwinding until > this is fixed? Just a thought. I don't think that's necessary. The results with dwarf2 unwinding are 1 FAIL less than without dwarf2 unwinding. Removing the dwarf2 unwinding might result in forgetting it. Keeping it in will remind us that the dwarf2 unwinder still needs a bit of work. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Cygwin Developer Red Hat, Inc.