From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27007 invoked by alias); 21 Sep 2003 19:57:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 26989 invoked from network); 21 Sep 2003 19:57:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO walton.kettenis.dyndns.org) (213.93.115.144) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 21 Sep 2003 19:57:36 -0000 Received: from elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org [192.168.0.2]) by walton.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.6p3/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h8LJvPWA000446; Sun, 21 Sep 2003 21:57:25 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from kettenis@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org) Received: from elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.6p3/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h8LJvPnY022095; Sun, 21 Sep 2003 21:57:25 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from kettenis@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org) Received: (from kettenis@localhost) by elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.6p3/8.12.6/Submit) id h8LJvOms022090; Sun, 21 Sep 2003 21:57:24 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 19:57:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200309211957.h8LJvOms022090@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> From: Mark Kettenis To: eliz@elta.co.il CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, ac131313@redhat.com In-reply-to: <9743-Sun21Sep2003152305+0300-eliz@elta.co.il> Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFA/RFC] Replecament for DEPRECATED_REG_STRUCT_HAS_ADDR References: <200309141313.h8EDD3um071823@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <9743-Sun21Sep2003152305+0300-eliz@elta.co.il> X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00448.txt.bz2 Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 15:23:06 +0200 From: "Eli Zaretskii" > Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 15:13:03 +0200 (CEST) > From: Mark Kettenis > > Eli, are the doc bits OK? Yes, thanks. (Sorry for the late response, I was travelling out of email access all of the last week.) No problem. You're probably the only one of us who has a notion of "timely review" anyway. It's in now (with a ChangeLog entry that mentions stabs_argument_has_addr instead of pass_argument_by_reference as the name of the new method). Thanks, Mark