From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1801 invoked by alias); 20 Sep 2003 22:35:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 1794 invoked from network); 20 Sep 2003 22:35:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 20 Sep 2003 22:35:56 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.22 #1 (Debian)) id 1A0qKa-00061D-Km for ; Sat, 20 Sep 2003 18:35:56 -0400 Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 22:35:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [6.0] PROBLEMS and NEWS Message-ID: <20030920223556.GA23118@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <3F6CBFA5.7060308@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3F6CBFA5.7060308@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00433.txt.bz2 On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 04:59:17PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: > Hello, > > This patch significantly expands the 6.0 NEWS file. It also drops a > strong hint about PPC, MIPS, SPARC and ARM in the problems file. > > Comments, objections, complaints? Looks good to me. Are PPC, MIPS, and SPARC the only ones left on mainline? I know Mark's got a SPARC update in the works, too. > +variables (even in optomized code). "optimized". -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer