From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24680 invoked by alias); 20 Sep 2003 22:03:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24649 invoked from network); 20 Sep 2003 22:03:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO concert.shout.net) (204.253.184.25) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 20 Sep 2003 22:03:20 -0000 Received: from duracef.shout.net (duracef.shout.net [204.253.184.12]) by concert.shout.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id h8KM3GHt008262; Sat, 20 Sep 2003 17:03:16 -0500 Received: from duracef.shout.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by duracef.shout.net (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h8KM3GVd006837; Sat, 20 Sep 2003 17:03:16 -0500 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) id h8KM3GMb006836; Sat, 20 Sep 2003 18:03:16 -0400 Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 22:03:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200309202203.h8KM3GMb006836@duracef.shout.net> To: ac131313@redhat.com Subject: Re: [testsuite] add gdb.cp/gdb1355.exp Cc: carlton@kealia.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00431.txt.bz2 mec> Neither. Just agreeing with what I'm assuming is David's assertion that mec> KFAIL and XFAIL both lead to people sweeping problems under the carpet. Okay, I see. I'm gonna go with FAIL because David likes it better and I'm pretty neutral. ac> Judgment call. If its possible for gdb to identify the corrupt input ac> then it needs to alert the user to the problem, and failing to do this ac> is a bug. I agree, but I don't have the resources to pursue this line of inquiry. Michael C