From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12128 invoked by alias); 18 Sep 2003 21:27:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 12121 invoked from network); 18 Sep 2003 21:27:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO concert.shout.net) (204.253.184.25) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 18 Sep 2003 21:27:10 -0000 Received: from duracef.shout.net (duracef.shout.net [204.253.184.12]) by concert.shout.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id h8ILR5Ht011006; Thu, 18 Sep 2003 16:27:05 -0500 Received: from duracef.shout.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by duracef.shout.net (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h8ILR5Vd000550; Thu, 18 Sep 2003 16:27:05 -0500 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) id h8ILR57W000549; Thu, 18 Sep 2003 17:27:05 -0400 Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 21:27:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200309182127.h8ILR57W000549@duracef.shout.net> To: ac131313@redhat.com, carlton@kealia.com Subject: Re: [testsuite] add gdb.cp/gdb1355.exp Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00407.txt.bz2 ac> I also intend again proposing that existing XFAILS get yanked. dc> That sounds okay to me. Mmmm, I would like to dig down a level, rather than just blow away setup_xfail calls. First I would like to decide which hp configurations and which *compilers* we support, do some test runs on them, and weed out stuff that we don't need. That would help out a lot. Similarly for Sun. Also I don't want to pay much attention to this until gdb 6.0 is out the door. dc> There are a few XFAILS which have a bug number associated with them dc> that's around 2400 or so: these are especially urgent, because it won't dc> be all _that_ long before the bug number might start looking like a GDB dc> bug number. So gdb has a PR-2k problem? :) Michael C