From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29181 invoked by alias); 18 Sep 2003 15:33:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 29174 invoked from network); 18 Sep 2003 15:33:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO concert.shout.net) (204.253.184.25) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 18 Sep 2003 15:33:31 -0000 Received: from duracef.shout.net (duracef.shout.net [204.253.184.12]) by concert.shout.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h8IFXS1W007793; Thu, 18 Sep 2003 10:33:28 -0500 Received: from duracef.shout.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by duracef.shout.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h8IFXSHK024465; Thu, 18 Sep 2003 10:33:28 -0500 Received: (from mec@localhost) by duracef.shout.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h8IFXRC9024464; Thu, 18 Sep 2003 11:33:27 -0400 Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 15:33:00 -0000 From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain Message-Id: <200309181533.h8IFXRC9024464@duracef.shout.net> To: ac131313@redhat.com Subject: Re: [testsuite] add gdb.cp/gdb1355.exp Cc: carlton@kealia.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00395.txt.bz2 ac> David is correct. Look at the number of additions to gdb.asm since it ac> was changed to FAIL instead of ERROR. ac> ac> However, we've adopted KFAIL XFAIL. Ummm, I am dense here ... are you favoring FAIL or XFAIL for this test result? (The situation is that gcc produces bad debug info which causes gdb to give bad results. The gcc bug has been fixed but we have a gdb test for the bug in case it comes back). Michael C