Re: SH patch 2 (was Re: [RFA] SH: Deprecate deprecated functions, use new frame interface)

Corinna Vinschen
2003-09-25T08:56:33Z

On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 09:58:56AM -0400, Elena Zannoni wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen writes:
> > On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 04:26:15PM -0400, Elena Zannoni wrote:
> > > Corinna Vinschen writes:
> > > > I don't think that's necessary. The results with dwarf2 unwinding are
> > > > 1 FAIL less than without dwarf2 unwinding. Removing the dwarf2
> > > > unwinding might result in forgetting it. Keeping it in will remind us
> > > > that the dwarf2 unwinder still needs a bit of work.
> > >
> > > I think so too. But I'd like to see if something can be done for SH
> > > similar to the i386_convert_register_p method.
> >
> > Is that necessary before the patch gets approval or could that be added
> > in a follow up step?
>
> After, yes.

Thanks, applied.