Re: SH patch 2 (was Re: [RFA] SH: Deprecate deprecated functions, use new frame interface)

Elena Zannoni
2003-09-24T18:12:28Z

Corinna Vinschen writes:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 04:26:15PM -0400, Elena Zannoni wrote:
> > Corinna Vinschen writes:
> > > I don't think that's necessary. The results with dwarf2 unwinding are
> > > 1 FAIL less than without dwarf2 unwinding. Removing the dwarf2
> > > unwinding might result in forgetting it. Keeping it in will remind us
> > > that the dwarf2 unwinder still needs a bit of work.
> >
> > I think so too. But I'd like to see if something can be done for SH
> > similar to the i386_convert_register_p method.
>
> Is that necessary before the patch gets approval or could that be added
> in a follow up step?

After, yes.

elena

>
> Corinna
>
> --
> Corinna Vinschen
> Cygwin Developer
> Red Hat, Inc.