Re: [PATCH] Properly define SSE registers for cygwin targets

Christopher Faylor
2003-09-14T17:35:28Z

On Sun, Sep 14, 2003 at 05:46:45PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 11:51:57 -0400
> From: Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>
>
> Another question: If HAVE_SSE_REGS was eliminated from all source files
> why wasn't it eliminated from win32-nat.c? Did I miss a memo?
>
>Well, I'm pretty sure I've burried a comment about Cygwin still using
>HAVE_SSE_REGS somewhere in a comment of one of the zillion
>i386-specific patches over the last year. Do you want me to drop you
>a note if something Cygwin-specific comes up?

Hmm. I usually scan the gdb-patches and gdb mailing lists for the cygwin
keyword but I probably missed this.

I appreciate the offer but I'll just try to make sure that I do better in
the future. There's no need for you to go to extra effort. Although,
if you notice something that requires an obvious fix in win32-nat.c, or
whatever, then feel free to check it in (maybe you're doing that
already). I'll be on the lookout for that too so that I can test
changes that impact cygwin.

cgf