Re: [PATCH] Properly define SSE registers for cygwin targets

Mark Kettenis
2003-09-14T15:46:57Z

Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 11:51:57 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>

Another question: If HAVE_SSE_REGS was eliminated from all source files
why wasn't it eliminated from win32-nat.c? Did I miss a memo?

Well, I'm pretty sure I've burried a comment about Cygwin still using
HAVE_SSE_REGS somewhere in a comment of one of the zillion
i386-specific patches over the last year. Do you want me to drop you
a note if something Cygwin-specific comes up?

Mark