From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-27069-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 27164 invoked by alias); 14 Sep 2003 15:46:57 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 27157 invoked from network); 14 Sep 2003 15:46:54 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO walton.kettenis.dyndns.org) (213.93.115.144)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 14 Sep 2003 15:46:54 -0000
Received: from elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org [192.168.0.2])
	by walton.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.6p2/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h8EFkjEf002058;
	Sun, 14 Sep 2003 17:46:45 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from kettenis@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org)
Received: from elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.6p2/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h8EFkjiA015101;
	Sun, 14 Sep 2003 17:46:45 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from kettenis@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org)
Received: (from kettenis@localhost)
	by elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.6p2/8.12.6/Submit) id h8EFkjeO015098;
	Sun, 14 Sep 2003 17:46:45 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 15:46:00 -0000
Message-Id: <200309141546.h8EFkjeO015098@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org>
From: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@chello.nl>
To: cgf@redhat.com
CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
In-reply-to: <20030913155157.GA15291@redhat.com> (message from Christopher
	Faylor on Sat, 13 Sep 2003 11:51:57 -0400)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Properly define SSE registers for cygwin targets
References: <20030913022759.GA2225@redhat.com> <200309131102.h8DB2xvx077846@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <20030913155157.GA15291@redhat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00303.txt.bz2

   Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 11:51:57 -0400
   From: Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>

   Another question:  If HAVE_SSE_REGS was eliminated from all source files
   why wasn't it eliminated from win32-nat.c?  Did I miss a memo?

Well, I'm pretty sure I've burried a comment about Cygwin still using
HAVE_SSE_REGS somewhere in a comment of one of the zillion
i386-specific patches over the last year.  Do you want me to drop you
a note if something Cygwin-specific comes up?

Mark