From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6086 invoked by alias); 13 Sep 2003 16:04:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 6079 invoked from network); 13 Sep 2003 16:04:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO redhat.com) (24.131.133.249) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 13 Sep 2003 16:04:15 -0000 Received: by redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 201) id 9EB3032A822; Sat, 13 Sep 2003 12:04:12 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 16:04:00 -0000 From: Christopher Faylor To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Cc: Mark Kettenis Subject: Re: [PATCH] Properly define SSE registers for cygwin targets Message-ID: <20030913160411.GA19655@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, Mark Kettenis References: <20030913022759.GA2225@redhat.com> <200309131102.h8DB2xvx077846@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <20030913155157.GA15291@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030913155157.GA15291@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00290.txt.bz2 On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 11:51:57AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >Where do you think CONTEXT_EXTENDED_REGISTERS comes from? Nevermind. Stupid question. Still waking up. cgf