From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14214 invoked by alias); 12 Sep 2003 05:46:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 14207 invoked from network); 12 Sep 2003 05:46:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO takamaka.act-europe.fr) (142.179.108.108) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 12 Sep 2003 05:46:52 -0000 Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 507) id 8AB44D2DAF; Thu, 11 Sep 2003 22:46:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 05:46:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Andrew Cagney Cc: Paul Koning , jimb@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] parse and eval breakpoint conditions with correct language Message-ID: <20030912054651.GI945@gnat.com> References: <20030910015400.GS423@gnat.com> <20030911180920.GD945@gnat.com> <16224.49692.542476.869174@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <20030911192958.GE945@gnat.com> <3F612249.7060102@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3F612249.7060102@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00258.txt.bz2 > BTW, this setting of the global current_language all also worries me :-) > Should parse_expression take an explict language? Me too, actually. I think passing the langauge to parse_expression et al is a good idea. It's more work, but seems more manageable than using a couple of global variables. Jim, what do you think? -- Joel